Subscribe or Renew Journal Index Online Journal Contact Reviews Current Issue Home
Reviews




 

July 2005

We have only included a few of our shorter reviews in this issue of Interpretation. If you would like to read more, please sign up for our trial subscription or become full-time subscriber today.

 

Song of Songs/Lamentations

Word Biblical Commentary. Thomas Nelson Publishers, Nashville, 2004. 479 pp. $39.99 (cloth). ISBN 0-8499-0825-6.

Two of humankind’s deepest experiences, love and loss, are examined through the poetry of Song of Songs and Lamentations. Within the context of ancient Near Eastern origins and the particularity of ancient Israel’s experiences, Garrett and House explore the truths the texts bear for Old Testament theology and for Christian faith. Arguing that Song of Songs is a unified work of love poetry by a single poet from the time of the united monarchy, Garrett regards the work as either written by Solomon or for him by an unknown court poet. As lyric poetry, thirteen individual songs with three vocal parts—“soprano” (woman’s part), “tenor” (man’s part), and “chorus” (girls of Jerusalem)— are woven into a chiastic structure having as its centerpiece “the sexual union of bride and groom on their wedding night” (p. 35). Informed by the work of Campbell and Lévi-Strauss, Garrett’s structural analysis presents Song of Songs as a heroic quest and transformation where a female protagonist moves from the undesirable state of virginity with the aid of the male redeemer figure to the desired state of loss of virginity. The poems reflect on the story of marriage portrayed as an idealized perfect first love. The heated desire expressed between the man and the woman celebrates a married relationship, monogamous and heterosexual.

While Garrett brings his own interpretation to Song of Songs, House works to acquaint readers with the importance of Lamentations for the faith and practice of present day Christians. Breaking no new ground, the goal is to place before the church the theological and practical significance of lamenting over sin. House is content to speak of a single, anonymous author writing “reasonably close to the time of the fall of Jerusalem” (p. 302) in 587 B.C.E. and to focus, as he believes the writer did, on a message that links sin, suffering, and lamentation.

Extensive bibliography, classical textual and literary criticism, and verse-by-verse analysis are strong points. Both writers have full command of pertinent scholarship, but while House acknowledges his indebtedness to others (note his high praise for Adele Berlin’s 2002 commentary, pp. 299–300), Garrett is at pains to discredit views he finds “absurd” (LaCocque, p. 20), “contrived” (Murphy, p. 21), or “driven by feminist ideology” (p. 38). Indeed, any view judged as feminist is readily denounced. Correct in his assessment that earlier attempts to allegorize miss the Song’s message, Garrett borders on allegory himself in developing the quest as a woman’s loss of virginity—equating, for example, the “guardians of the walls” with her virginity (p. 114) and her “mother’s house” as her womb (p. 104).

Kandy Queen-Sutherland
Stetson University
DeLand, Florida

Sexuality and the Jesus Tradition

Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, 2005. 296 pp. $30.00. ISBN 0-8028-2862-0.

Sexuality is narrowly rendered in Loader’s work. His discussion employs the Synoptic Gospels along with extensive use of 1 Corinthians 7 on lust, adultery, divorce, and celibacy. The book is scholarly in approach, offering the Greek with translation for each passage, and including extensive footnotes.

The conclusions offered are definitive. Divorce is not permitted, except for Paul’s allowance that an unbeliever may initiate it against a believer. Remarriage is adultery because it violates the original marital union and divine order. Marriage is at best a temporary state because sexual relations will not exist in the coming kingdom. It is the option for “widows and widowers” who cannot exercise self-control over sexual passion (p. 164). Celibacy is chosen by Jesus, Paul, and John the Baptist as the greater means of service to God as prophets (p. 216).

Two of the topics examined by Loader should encourage further questions about sexually related behavior. He begins with Matthew 5:27–28, regarding men looking upon women with lust. He places the responsibility on the man for control of his sexual impulses, differentiating between sexual arousal and intent. In his treatment of the “excision passages” of Matthew 5:29–30 and Mark 9:43–48, Loader speaks of the sexual abuse of children. Although he assumes that this is a common concern of the biblical period, the footnotes do not fully support this (p. 23). He intimates that small children may have been brought to Jesus for the purpose of sexual availability, eliciting his response of warning against causing “these little ones” to stumble.

Loader exhibits some inconsistency with the biblical use of euphemisms for genital references. Concerning cutting off “hand’ and “foot,” he extrapolates that masturbation is forbidden. In the anointing of the feet of Jesus with perfume, however, Loader sees no sexual reference because of the lack of objection by the disciples who only mention the financial waste (p. 40), a puzzling inference. In the encounter with Mary Magdalene in the garden, the interpretation of “touch” as to “have sexual relations” is disallowed as “hardly likely” (p. 147). This further serves his depiction of Jesus as celibate. Loader has depended upon the latter translation in other instances to make his point about sexual expression.

While there is some movement toward defining sexuality as relational in his “one flesh” discussion, Loader does not pursue the implications. He has chosen to approach each of the selected teachings on sexuality only within their early context, with limited recognition of the wider principles of the gospel. Those looking for modern applications from this treatment of sexuality will have to look elsewhere. In his concluding chapter, Loader proposes that further work be done along these lines.

Debra Reagan
Union-PSCE
Richmond, Virginia

Fortress Introduction to the Prophets

Fortress, Minneapolis, 2004. 115 pp. $16.00. ISBN 0-8006-3670-8.

“This volume seeks above all else to understand the message of the prophets within the context of their own past and present situations, understanding their message to be directed to the immediacy of conflicted and critical events contemporary with the prophets themselves” (p. viii). Hutton focuses his comments on the expli-citly socio-historical context of prophecy, rather than the literary or theological contexts. An introductory chapter addresses five “questions that have fundamentally shaped the debate” (p. 1) with respect to prophetic literature. Then Hutton introduces Amos, Hosea, Isaiah of Jerusalem (a.k.a. First Isaiah), Micah, Interim Prophets (Zephaniah, Nahum, Habakkuk), and Jeremiah.

Upon reading the Table of Contents, one is immediately struck by two discoveries. First, the only prophets to be introduced in this study are the pre-exilic, classical (or writing) prophets. No attention is given to the pre-exilic, non-writing prophets (Elijah et al.) who are part of the Jewish canon of prophecy. The exilic and post-exilic prophets are peculiarly absent from this volume, notable prophets like Second and Third Isaiah, Ezekiel, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi, and others. Second, Hutton’s discussion of Jeremiah takes up forty-nine of the available pages, fully 45 percent of the book. Hutton’s introductory work on Jeremiah, the prophet and the prophetic book, is helpful. Unfortunately, when the reader compares the number of pages on Jeremiah to the small number of pages devoted to the other prophets, it is hard not to feel cheated. By contrast, Hosea, Micah, and the three interim prophets get eight pages, Amos gets ten pages, and Isaiah of Jerusalem gets sixteen pages. Truth in advertising should mandate the title, “Introduction to Jeremiah and Other Pre-exilic Prophets.”

Hutton successfully addresses his intended audience of “those who are, for the first time, encountering Israel’s prophetic literature in a serious study or who wish to regain a familiarity with the ‘forest’ so that they can once again slug their way through the ‘trees’ of weekly lectionary texts” (p. viii). Although Hebrew words are often transliterated but not translated into English, this brief introductory study is indeed accessible by persons who are not biblical scholars and would work well for a Sunday School class or Bible Study.

Marty E. Stevens
Lutheran Theological Southern Seminary
Columbia, South Carolina

Preaching Judges

Preaching Classic Texts.Chalice, St. Louis, 2003. 162 pp. $18.99. ISBN 0-8272-2977-1.

Here is a most helpful book for any biblical preacher who wishes to take the full measure of the canon. The Revised Common Lectionary includes precisely one text from the book of Judges—for all three years. But Jeter’s volume just might have a few fingers walking toward this strange book after all.

Jeter first does well what he knows he must do: convince us that we should spend some time with this biblical piece. The first chapter is thus, “why preach from Judges?” Seven reasons are offered, from “it is in the canon” to “it is filled with great stories.” All seven of Jeter’s reasons are persuasive and are formulated from a wide variety of sources. In fact, that is one of this volume’s greatest strengths, namely, its rich use of art, literature, and popular culture. Jeter has a wonderful way of illustrating his ideas, and he offers generously to his readers a vast array of them for their own sermonic use (p. 144).

The remainder of the book moves through the texts of Judges in canonical order, spending significant exegetical time on more familiar passages—Samson (and the women) and Jephthah (and his daughter) each get a chapter. However, lesser known texts are treated to insightful commentary as well. Jeter melds his commentary and his homiletical reflections so seamlessly that the reader is on occasion surprised to find that a sermon is being preached when the reader thought that exegesis was being offered. For this reader that is no bad thing.
One could quarrel with some details. For example, one commentary/sermon on Gideon that urges us to “keep the faith” ends in a very maudlin poem (p. 77). Also, I found the reading of Barak in Judges 4 as “just needing a comrade” when he urges Deborah to go with him to battle to be somewhat weak. Every man in the chapter is portrayed as a coward (especially Sisera); there is little reason to hear Barak any differently.

Still, this is a delightful read and a genuinely wise one from a preacher/scholar who has spent his life in love with the Bible, warts and all. Jeter has read widely in the biblical and homiletical literature on Judges and has offered his mature work to us.

John C. Holbert
Perkins School of Theology
Dallas, Texas


Interpretation - 3401 Brook Road - Richmond, Virginia 23227